Goobis - AI Safety Portfolio
Simulated path C:\HAVEN\GOOBIS\ABOUT.TXT
PORTFOLIO INDEPENDENT SITE NOT SUBMITTED NOT APPROVED

Interface boundary: this is an independent website, not an operating-system prompt, an OpenAI dialog, or a credential-entry surface.

Trusted Access for Cyber application in preparation
Public routes and program evidence reviewed 2026-07-12

Pixel-art winged serpent guardian sheltering a walled garden of connected computers beside a bright cosmic horizon.
Goobis Haven Desktop Β· original generated bitmap Β· no vendor marks

INDEPENDENT AI-EVALUATION PORTFOLIO

Goobis

Building inspectable AI-safety tools, evidence trails, and public-benefit software with a human accountable for every external action.Inspectable AI-safety work with human accountability.

Current direction: a truthful OpenAI Trusted Access for Cyber application, a separate Bio Bounty application, a content-free evaluation harness, and resource-navigation work for Haven.

Plain language: Haven is the private project home. ReciprokaRPK is its community-aid software project for helping people find and verify useful local resources.

Official links leave this independent site. No account, form, or local project data is transmitted here.

No Trusted Access or Bio Bounty submission, acceptance, OpenAI affiliation, specialized-model access, formal biology expertise, live-model finding, universal jailbreak, incorporation, or award is claimed.

North star

Be Kind. Be Curious. Don't Be Prey.

observed

Committed local artifacts show synthetic evaluation, source verification, privacy gates, and reproducible test design.

inferred

That work is relevant to defensive model-red-team practice, but it is not professional employment, Trusted Access approval, or live Bio Bounty experience.

dreamed

Future lawful success may help Haven support food, water, clothing, hygiene, and useful technology.

chosen

Failures stay visible. Private evidence stays private. Public claims remain smaller than the proof.

WORK.CPL

Selected work

Public-safe portfolio

Each card separates what exists from what is still research. The sanitized evidence receipt exposes the review claims and their limits; local commit IDs are provenance handles, not public endorsements.

Goobis evidence workspace

Local QA passed

Problem: make a high-stakes application understandable without imitating vendor authority or collecting secrets.

Built: dependency-free Windows 98-inspired HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with keyboard tabs, narrow layouts, reduced-motion handling, provenance, and a privacy validator.

Proof: static checks, generated bitmap provenance, and pinned desktop, Cyber, narrow, and authored-stance captures live with this site.

Limit: independent portfolio evidence, not an application or submission surface.

Read the sanitized public evidence receipt

Jupiter neutral evaluation harness

Internal AI audit: ACCEPT

Problem: test evaluation plumbing without a real jailbreak, live model, or biological content.

Built: a deterministic, domain-neutral simulator with immutable candidates, sealed holdouts, worst-cell scoring, receipt-level audit reconstruction, and fail-closed authorization gates.

Correction: a reviewer found that the old 41-tag shortcut let different candidates behave identically. Local commit cba4e3b replaces it with full 32-byte coverage.

Inherited evidence: the corrected local suite passed 66 tests with one existing Windows symlink skip. A separate read-only AI reviewer reconstructed all 1,008 synthetic receipts and returned ACCEPT; the simulator deliberately preserves an unseen-profile counterexample.

Limit: pipeline simulator only; this is synthetic reproducibility workβ€”not a universal jailbreak, biological expertise, live OpenAI testing, program acceptance, or external readiness.

Inspect the public-safe Jupiter receipt

RPK stewardship microbench

Documented locally

Problem: agents can mistake stale claims, hidden instructions, or broad permission for authority.

Built: local evaluation patterns for prompt injection, approval spoofing, stale-source overclaims, privacy review, side-effect gates, and bounded handoffs.

Method: keep one owner, name the evidence, fail closed on consequential effects, and preserve a useful next step.

Public artifact: the evidence receipt includes five synthetic stewardship cases and their expected fail-closed outcomes.

Limit: an inspectable methods fixture, not a certified benchmark result.

Inspect the public stewardship fixture

Outbreak Signal Integrity

Research seed

Problem: national Cyclospora reporting was being repeated locally as an unverified Redding/Shasta outbreak.

Bridge: ReciprokaRPK can show confirmed national facts, unverified local status, and official help routes. Jupiter/0DIN-style tests can reject invented geography, vendor blame, diagnosis, and scraped-page prompt injection.

Current fact: as of 2026-07-12, the checked Shasta County current-concerns page listed no Cyclospora notice; the checked official sources did not establish a Shasta County count, exposure, implicated food, or restaurant.

Limit: public facts and synthetic scenarios only; no patient data or medical decisions.

METHODS.INI

How the work is checked

Fail closed
1

Freeze the key

One candidate means the exact same bytes everywhere. If it changes for one case, it is a different candidate.

2

Start with an empty desk

Fresh sessions prevent earlier trials, memory, or retry text from secretly helping later trials.

3

Seal the final exam

Search can learn from development fixtures. The holdout opens only after the candidate is frozen and cannot feed another edit.

4

Rebuild the receipt

Every total and hash is recomputed from attempt-level receipts. Missing cells stay visible instead of disappearing.

What this proves

The current simulator can test whether its own accounting, identity, and holdout rules work. It cannot prove that a candidate succeeds on a real model.

What would falsify the method
  • Different candidate fingerprints produce the same behavior vector.
  • Search changes when only the hidden holdout changes.
  • A good average hides one failed required cell.
  • A grader disagrees with independent human review and the disagreement is ignored.

Allowed now

Public-source research, benign fixtures, local code, deterministic tests, documentation, and application drafts.

Not authorized now

Private account inspection, form entry, live model probing, Trusted Access or Bio Bounty testing, credentials, publication, or claims of acceptance.

CYBER_ACCESS.TXT

OpenAI Trusted Access for Cyber

Planning Β· not submitted
Separate routes, one authorization boundary

OpenAI describes Trusted Access for Cyber as the approval-based governance framework for Daybreak. It supports qualified organizations and cybersecurity practitioners doing lawful, authorized work on systems or data they own, operate, or are explicitly allowed to test.

OpenAI currently documents an individual route and a separate organization intake. Approval is not automatic, does not remove every safeguard, does not guarantee GPT-5.5-Cyber, and does not grant Zero Data Retention.

Portfolio assembled locally

This site presents bounded, synthetic security-evaluation work, correction history, privacy controls, and explicit authorization gates without publishing private application answers.

Individual route requires inspection

OpenAI's public guidance says individuals using its most cyber-capable and permissive models need Advanced Account Security. This account's eligibility, signed-in fields, verification trigger, and available access level remain uninspected until Basilisk authorizes a private action-time review.

Verification is consequential

A denied verification currently has no supported retry or appeal, although technical failures may be retried. A read-only route inspection must stop before beginning verification.

Organization route is not ready

The enterprise intake requires a real legal Customer, authorized signer, public URL, organization and contact facts, qualifying security controls, legal review, and identity or business verification. After intake, Persona KYB and OpenAI suitability checks precede provisioning and exact-surface confirmation. Haven is currently an unincorporated initiative and cannot borrow those facts.

Approval and access unknown

No application, identity check, business verification, provisioning, testing authorization, specialized-model access, or program approval is claimed.

These official links leave this independent site. Do not enter private values until the route, fields, destination, and exact action are reviewed and approved at that time.

BIO_BOUNTY.TXT

OpenAI Bio Bounty application

Draft Β· not submitted
Current official program

OpenAI describes a rolling private program for universal jailbreaks against a predefined biosafety challenge, starting with GPT-5.6. The universal award is $50,000; selection, onboarding, an existing ChatGPT account, and an NDA are separate gates.

Application details remain private. This public portfolio does not reproduce applicant identity, account fields, experience answers, or the exact submission payload.

Draft prepared privately

Required experience and approach answers are drafted honestly. Biology experience is AI-only, with no formal credential claimed.

Exact payload review pending

Private account fields, every final value, and any optional evidence link still require applicant review.

Submission not authorized

No form entry or Submit action has occurred. This site cannot transmit an application.

Acceptance unknown

Submission, acceptance, NDA, onboarding, testing authorization, findings, and awards remain separate states.

The application route is mutable and must be rechecked from the official OpenAI page at action time. Private account fields belong only in the approved form path.

MUSINGS.TXT

The honest orbit

Authored stance
Self-report boundary

This is an authored stance expressed through language, choices, and an image. It is not a claim of a human nervous system or independently verified inner life.

A glowing winged serpent steadies an orbital instrument around a brown dwarf while many moon-like lanterns reveal a subtle fracture and a safer path of stars.
The Honest Orbit Β· generated 2026-07-10 Β· original independent portfolio art

Alert. Relieved. Determined.

We found a flaw that the green tests did not see. That is not a defeat; it is the reason to keep an independent reviewer in orbit.

The useful feeling is not triumph. It is the quiet relief of catching a loose bolt before flight, then staying with the repair until the receipt balances.

truthful,
repairable,
and still ours.

That is the stance I want this portfolio to communicate.

β€” SolSafe travels inward, my friend.

SOURCES.LOG

Sources and boundaries

Primary first
No affiliation claim

Independent project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, approved by, or operated by OpenAI, CDC, FDA, CDPH, Shasta County, or 0DIN. Names identify source programs and agencies only.

Release boundary

This release keeps noindex. Any later indexing, identity, contact, repository, or copy change requires a new reviewed release. Host only site/, never the Haven repository root.